Sign In
Ask Question
Emerson Montoya
Law
25 January, 10:09
Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
+3
Answers (
1
)
Zachery Booth
25 January, 10:16
0
Explanation:Mapp v. Ohio, case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 19, 1961, ruled (6-3) that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," is inadmissible in state courts.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Outcome of mapp vs Ohio ...”
in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which of the following BEST describes the hero of Paradise Lost? A. "Aonian mount" B. "Infernal Serpent" C. "One greater Man" D. "Oracle of God"
Answers (1)
The primary justification for the unique procedural safeguards approved by the Supreme Court was the "death is different" principle. Group of answer choices True False
Answers (1)
How would a strict constructionist characterize the Federal government
Answers (1)
Brainstorm a list of qualities that characterize a juvenile, but not an adult.?
Answers (1)
What is the definition of Citizenship
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
Describe the traditional police organizational structure. Discuss it's strengths and weaknesses
Answers (1)
How is having a free press related to a fair trial?
Answers (1)
Why doesnt america and other continents print their owm money
Answers (2)
2) Deterrence: punishment can discourage future crime -Includes: specific and general deterrence -Examples:
Answers (1)
Explain the mistake that governments are making when they collaborate with industries according to Marks.
Answers (1)
Home
»
Law
» Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?