Sign In
Ask Question
Emerson Montoya
Law
25 January, 10:09
Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
+3
Answers (
1
)
Zachery Booth
25 January, 10:16
0
Explanation:Mapp v. Ohio, case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 19, 1961, ruled (6-3) that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," is inadmissible in state courts.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Outcome of mapp vs Ohio ...”
in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which of these investments may pay dividends? Bonds IRAS Mutual funds Stocks
Answers (2)
What is the meaning of NECO
Answers (2)
Which argument is true for the classical theory of criminology
Answers (1)
4. Kinetic energy is the energy a body possesses when it is in ... A. О in a state dormant B. a state of motion c. in a state change
Answers (2)
Why did the us supreme court rule against the state of tennessee in baker v. Carr? Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters. Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
Should felons be allowed to vote after they have served their time?
Answers (2)
Which of these powers is considered implied power
Answers (2)
Fixed amount of money earned regardless of hours worked
Answers (1)
Explain the Congregate System, the Contract Labor System and the Anti Contract Law of 1887. Who was corrupt and how was it corrected?
Answers (1)
The workers at Mariah Trucking went on strike over wages. Mariah trucking may hire permanent replacement workers and, when the strike is over, Mariah trucking has no obligation to lay off the replacement workers to make room for the strikers. True
Answers (1)
Home
»
Law
» Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?