Sign In
Ask Question
Emerson Montoya
Law
25 January, 10:09
Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
+3
Answers (
1
)
Zachery Booth
25 January, 10:16
0
Explanation:Mapp v. Ohio, case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 19, 1961, ruled (6-3) that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," is inadmissible in state courts.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Outcome of mapp vs Ohio ...”
in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
1. Was Cotton exonerated as a result?
Answers (1)
Which of the following statements is true of white collar crime in the United States?
Answers (1)
Jeremy, age twenty, is caught stealing credit cards from several of his friends' parents. Describe, step by step, what will happen to him during a criminal investigation and trial.
Answers (1)
What is the tax base for the sales tax?
Answers (2)
What is shock incarceration
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
Marilyn was fired from her job as a sales clerk at a department store after refusing to work on Sundays. The Christian Reformed Church, of which she was a member, prohibited working on Sunday.
Answers (1)
3-38 Alimony. As a result of their divorce, Fred agreed to pay alimony to Tammy of $20,000 per year. The payments are to cease in the event of Fred's or Tammy's death or in the event of Tammy's remarriage.
Answers (1)
Special laws passed by southern state governments immediately after the civil war. They were designed to control former slaves. True or False
Answers (1)
Which law is meant to protect and preserve land, air, water, forest, and wildlife
Answers (2)
Which law made it harder for some europeans to immigrate to the united states and easier for others?
Answers (1)
Home
»
Law
» Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?