Sign In
Ask Question
Emerson Montoya
Law
25 January, 10:09
Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
+3
Answers (
1
)
Zachery Booth
25 January, 10:16
0
Explanation:Mapp v. Ohio, case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 19, 1961, ruled (6-3) that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," is inadmissible in state courts.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Outcome of mapp vs Ohio ...”
in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What was Mario cuomo then New York State governor referring to when he said No foreign people or force has ever done this to us until now we felt invulnerable
Answers (1)
In which of the following ways do utilitarians and Aristotle stand united against Rawls's liberalism? a) Utilitarians and Aristotle believe in natural rights, whereas Rawlsian liberals are concerned mostly with liberty.
Answers (1)
What is Constitutional adjudication
Answers (1)
What do park rangers go?
Answers (2)
What are the advantages and disadvantages to plea bargaining?
Answers (2)
New Questions in Law
What did the Supreme Court decide in the Citizens United case? A. Corporations and unions may seek to persuade voters in elections. Corporations and unions cannot enter into politics. B.
Answers (1)
Which of the following is NOT a major type of cybercrime reported to the IC3? a. government impersonation scams b. advance fee fraud c. identity theft d. malware fraud
Answers (2)
Scott Test solutions that turn blue indicate the presence of:
Answers (1)
How does the right to a grand jury protect the rights of the accused
Answers (1)
Take it easy, boss! It's not that I'm just standing around. I'm supervising!
Answers (1)
Home
»
Law
» Outcome of mapp vs Ohio
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?