Ask Question
19 July, 16:38

RaeAnn and Rick Telford purchased an existing home in a neighborhood of multi-million-dollar homes. After moving in, the Telfords learned that the home had been owned formerly by a couple that was indicted for drug trafficking. The home had been raided by DEA agents, and there had been a shoot-out before the couple was taken into custody. The couple's youngest child was killed in the house during the shoot-out. RaeAnn and Rick:

a. have no recourse if there is nothing physically wrong with the house.

b. have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them.

c. have no remedy becasue neither sellers nor brokers are required to disclose psychological issues with properties

. d. none of the above

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 19 July, 17:04
    0
    b. have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them

    Explanation:

    In business law, one of the main grounds of rescission are: misrepresentation (whether fraudulent, negligent or innocent), non-disclosure in relation to contracts of insurance, and

    undue influence, duress and unconscionability.

    In this case, RaeAnn and Rick have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “RaeAnn and Rick Telford purchased an existing home in a neighborhood of multi-million-dollar homes. After moving in, the Telfords learned ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers