Law

1 September, 02:31

In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that:

a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk.

b. Miranda does not need to be given by private police.

c. an individual being investigated by police may not be denied counsel.

d. indigent defendants are entitled to a lawyer when seeking an appeal.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that: a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk. b. Miranda does not ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

The supreme court most often considers constitutional issues that involve

What is the difference between forbearance and deferment?

Describe the Federal Court System as it applies to the Criminal Justice System

If all judges on the Supreme Court are present, how many votes are needed for a verdict? A. 9 B 4 C. 7 D. 5 E. 6

The country of Hykenia does not trade with any other country. Its GDP is $20 billion. Its government collects $4 billion in taxes and pays out $3 billion to households in the form of transfer payments.

New Questions in Law

Stupid answers here (ex. a b c d)

What did the Supreme Court decide in the Citizens United case? A. Corporations and unions may seek to persuade voters in elections. Corporations and unions cannot enter into politics. B.

Which of the following is NOT a major type of cybercrime reported to the IC3? a. government impersonation scams b. advance fee fraud c. identity theft d. malware fraud

Scott Test solutions that turn blue indicate the presence of:

How does the right to a grand jury protect the rights of the accused