Ask Question
2 January, 12:39

19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 2 January, 12:55
    0
    "Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i. e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i. e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e. g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court? ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers