The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because "the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others" in:a. Payton v. New York b. Warden v. Hayden c. United States v. Watson d. Tennessee v. Garner
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Over of underage drinkers meet the clinical criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence a) 25% b) 40% c) 62%
Answers (1)
Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped to call 9-1-1 and began to render aid while waiting on the ambulance.
Answers (1)
Drivers must yield the right of way to Any pedestrian using a guide dog. Motorcyclists at all times. Any pedestrian crossing the street in a controlled intersection. Any pedestrian carrying a white cane. A, C and D.
Answers (1)
Which of the following statements about railroad crossings is FALSE? ◍Never start to cross if there isn't room for your vehicle on the far side. ◍It is wise to shift gears when crossing railroad tracks. ◍You must yield to crossing trains.
Answers (2)
Dr. Mastrodiavolo tells a young married couple Jack and Jill that he cannot save their newborn baby during its delivery and hands them a stillborn child. Jack and Jill are heartbroken. Then dr.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
An accounting report that shows the changes in capital during the accounting period is a/an
Answers (1)
Why is sociology important to the development understanding of social problems
Answers (1)
Case #1: Lynch v. Donnelly The facts: Given your understanding of the establishment clause, what argument could the group have made?
Answers (2)
A hand lotion company decided to run a BCG Matrix analysis on its business. What did they potentially discover?
Answers (1)
Yolanda and Rodney agreed that Rodney would paint Yolanda's home for $800, with Yolanda supplying the paint. Rodney went to Yolanda's home on several occasions to do the job, but she never had the paint ready. Finally, he moved on to other jobs.
Answers (2)