Ask Question
15 August, 12:12

The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because "the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others" in:a. Payton v. New York b. Warden v. Hayden c. United States v. Watson d. Tennessee v. Garner

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 15 August, 12:18
    0
    Correct answer will be (B) - Warden V. Hayden
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers