Ask Question
17 September, 19:04

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? Their action did not negatively influence other students. Their action was not disruptive. Their action occurred off school grounds. Their action was political speech. In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? Their action did not negatively influence other students. Their action was not disruptive. Their action occurred off school grounds. Their action was political speech.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 17 September, 19:06
    0
    In the Tinker case what would have happened to the students if they did not listen to the school. What was the Supreme Court decision on the Tinker Case? They ruled in favor of the students. It held that armbands were form of "speech" because the armbands were symbols representing ideas.
  2. 17 September, 19:33
    0
    its d on E2020
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? Their action did not negatively ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers