Ask Question
4 April, 16:03

Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.)

Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.

The original case was decided in a different type of court than the current case.

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

The judge in the ruling case did not use all the facts presented when making a decision.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 4 April, 16:29
    0
    The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

    The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

    this one makes some sense

    Explanation:

    if they both get charged the judge can make them speak
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.) Some of the ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers