Olga enters into a contract to buy a refrigerator from a Prairie States Appliance store with the price to be paid in monthly installments. After thirty-six months of payments, Olga has paid more than twice the price of a similar stove. Eighteen payments remain due under the contract. Refer to Fact Pattern 20-1. Under the UCC, the court can evaluate the contract to determine whether it was unreasonably unfair and one sided

A) at the time it was made.

B) at the end of its term.

C) in the middle of its performance.

D) at the time of Olga's suit.

Question

Brooks Yoder

Law

11 August, 11:41

Olga enters into a contract to buy a refrigerator from a Prairie States Appliance store with the price to be paid in monthly installments. After thirty-six months of payments, Olga has paid more than twice the price of a similar stove. Eighteen payments remain due under the contract. Refer to Fact Pattern 20-1. Under the UCC, the court can evaluate the contract to determine whether it was unreasonably unfair and one sided

A) at the time it was made.

B) at the end of its term.

C) in the middle of its performance.

D) at the time of Olga's suit.

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Britney Mcpherson · Answer 1

A

Explanation:

At the time it was made

Emiliano Diaz · Answer 2

Answer: at the time it was made

Explanation: The doctrine of unconscionability is a doctrine in contract law that describes terms that are so extremely unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power. A principle that one party to a contract might be entitled to a remedy if the other party has behaved in an unconscionable manner.