Danny and Marion Klein were injured when part of a fireworks display went astray and exploded near them. They sued Pyrodyne Corp., the pyrotechnic com - pany that was hired to set up and discharge the fireworks. The Kleins alleged, among other things, that the company should be strictly liable for damages caused by the fireworks display. Will the court agree with the Kleins

Question

Makenna

Law

8 January, 03:23

Danny and Marion Klein were injured when part of a fireworks display went astray and exploded near them. They sued Pyrodyne Corp., the pyrotechnic com - pany that was hired to set up and discharge the fireworks. The Kleins alleged, among other things, that the company should be strictly liable for damages caused by the fireworks display. Will the court agree with the Kleins

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Roberto Watkins · Answer 1

Answer: yes the court will agree with Klein's

Explanation:

The com-pany dealt with the fireworks before the injury occurred.

Whereas fireworks are inherently dangerous as there are explosions and fire. The court hold the company strictly liable.

Therefore, Pryodyne Company will be held strictly liable for participating in abnormally dangerous activity.

Darwin Montoya · Answer 2

check the explanation

Explanation:

I believe and also expect the court will agree with them. The company ought to also be hiring firework gurus so as to make sure the display is under control. Those employees are expected to stop individuals who are not at the show or partaking in the event from any sort of damages that is related with the fireworks.