Ask Question
19 December, 00:38

An officer has made application for a court order approving electronic surveillance of Defendant. The order is granted, stating: "From June 1 to June 7, Officer X, having established probable cause, is granted the authority to intercept the wire communications of Defendant." The officer proceeded to enter Defendant's house, without a warrant, to install the listening device. Eventually, a recording is made of Defendant discussing his illegal activities with a friend. Defendant is arrested, charged, and has filed a motion to suppress the interception. Defendant asserts that the entry into his house was illegal. Discuss.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 19 December, 00:59
    0
    he wasn't granted permission to enter the home

    Explanation:

    he was granted right to monitor not break in to his home
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “An officer has made application for a court order approving electronic surveillance of Defendant. The order is granted, stating: "From June ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers