Law

24 April, 07:11

What change to policing resulted from Miranda v. Arizona?

O

A. Police must inform suspects that they may remain silent and have

a lawyer present during questioning.

O

B. Police must make suspects feel comfortable and encourage them

to express themselves.

O

C. Police must provide all suspects with a lawyer at the time of

arrest.

O

D. Police must respect suspects' right to free speech.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “What change to policing resulted from Miranda v. Arizona? O A. Police must inform suspects that they may remain silent and have a lawyer ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which of the following is a characteristic of the Patriot Act? Select one: (A) Extends the tap-and-trace provisions of existing wiretap statutes to the Internet, and mandates certain technological modifications at ISPs to facilitate electronic

Who is the FOA and what are three important tasks of the FOA

How much do you trust social media to give you facts and full story in an unbiased manner

What is the purpose of the alien and sedition acts?

Which of the following is NOT a new technology that makes correctional institutions safer?

New Questions in Law

Describe the traditional police organizational structure. Discuss it's strengths and weaknesses

How is having a free press related to a fair trial?

Why doesnt america and other continents print their owm money

2) Deterrence: punishment can discourage future crime -Includes: specific and general deterrence -Examples:

Explain the mistake that governments are making when they collaborate with industries according to Marks.