Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.

Question

Kristen Santiago

Law

9 January, 08:31

Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Brylee Burke · Answer 1

A

Explanation:

The Restatement (Second) of Contracts is a general principles of contract common law.

Promissory Estoppel is a legal principle in contract law that stops a person on breaking the promise.

Courts forr promissory Estoppel mentioned in Restatement (Second) of Contracts because "Restatement" is the law and is frequently referred to.