Ask Question
11 May, 18:18

Suppose, in fact, the mean annual consumption of popcorn after the marketing campaign is 58 58 quarts. has a type i or type ii error been made by the marketing department? if we tested this hypothesis at the alpha α equals = 0.01 0.01 level of significance, what is the probability of committing this error? select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box within your choice.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 11 May, 18:33
    0
    The marketing department committed a Type I error because the marketing department rejected the null hypothesis when it was true. The probability of making a Type I error is 0.01.

    Explanation:

    Null Hypothesis: H₀ : µ = 58.58

    Alternative Hypothesis: H₁ : µ> 58.58

    A type I error is made by the marketing department if the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true and a type II error occurs, when the marketing department fails to reject the null hypothesis when it should be rejected.

    The probability of making a Type I error is α, which is the level of significance you set for your hypothesis test, in our case 0.01 while the probability of making a Type II error is β, which depends on the power of the test.

    Based on this we can therefore conclude that the marketing department committed a Type I error because the marketing department rejected the null hypothesis when it was true. The probability of making a Type I error is 0.01.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Suppose, in fact, the mean annual consumption of popcorn after the marketing campaign is 58 58 quarts. has a type i or type ii error been ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers