Jane and Nancy were both awarded National Merit Scholarships (for academic excellence), and both love mathematics. Jane breezed through Dr. Morgan's calculus class. Thus, Nancy should do well in that class, too."

This argument is:

a. Deductive and Valid

b. Deductive and Invalid

c. Inductive and Strong

d. Inductive and Weak

Question

Guest

Mathematics

30 June, 20:12

Jane and Nancy were both awarded National Merit Scholarships (for academic excellence), and both love mathematics. Jane breezed through Dr. Morgan's calculus class. Thus, Nancy should do well in that class, too."

This argument is:

a. Deductive and Valid

b. Deductive and Invalid

c. Inductive and Strong

d. Inductive and Weak

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Shane · Answer 1

c. Inductive and Strong

Step-by-step explanation:

In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.

As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.

The answer is:

c. Inductive and Strong