A grocery store owner claims that the mean amount spent per checkout is more than $74. A test is made of H0: μ = 74 versus H1: μ > 74. The null hypothesis is rejected. State the appropriate conclusion. Group of answer choices

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. The complete question is:

A grocery store owner claims that the mean amount spent per checkout is more than $74. A test is made of H0: μ = 74 versus H1: μ > 74. The null hypothesis is rejected. State the appropriate conclusion. A) There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean checkout price is greater than $74. B) The mean checkout amount is less than or equal to $74 C) The mean checkout amount is greater than $74. D) There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean checkout price is less than or equal to $74

Solution:

The alternative hypothesis is the opposite of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that is true if the null hypothesis is false.

Since the null hypothesis is rejected, it means that there was enough evidence to make us accept the alternative hypothesis. Considering the given scenario, the correct option would be

B) The mean checkout amount is greater than $74