Ask Question

Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 29 May, 04:20
    0
    The answer is ASA.

    Given that ∠A = ∠O, ∠W = ∠N, SW = TN, this shows that the two angles (∠A and ∠W) and the included side SW of the first triangle are equal to the two angles (∠O and ∠N) and the included side TN of the second triangle. This means that third angles ∠S and ∠T are also equal. Therefore, the two triangles ΔWAS and ΔNOT are congruent based from the ASA Postulate.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN. ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers