Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
A. The information was written elsewhere.
B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,
C. There are no listed source references,
D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.
+2
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Home » Mathematics » Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. There are no listed source references, D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.