Ask Question
6 March, 05:36

Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?

A. The information was written elsewhere.

B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,

C. There are no listed source references,

D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 6 March, 06:02
    0
    B. Anyone can post anonymous entries.

    Step-by-step explanation:

    This is the most likely Answer considering it is 100% true, anyone can write anything even if it is their own opinion, which could lead to false information. This is also considered to be a public domain considering anyone can write and publish and edit what they would like to on Wikipedia.
  2. 6 March, 06:05
    0
    Answer: b
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers