Jackson is testing different types of planting soil to determine which type is most effective for growing strawberry bushes. He purchases two different brands of planting soil from a local store. Jackson applies brand A to an area of the yard that receives full sunlight and brand B to another area of the yard that is in partial sunlight. He waters the area with brand B daily; he waters the area with brand A every other day. At the end of the study, Jackson concludes brand A is more effective in growing strawberry bushes. Is Jackson's conclusion valid? Explain why or why not.

Question

Kassandra

Mathematics

20 January, 21:14

Jackson is testing different types of planting soil to determine which type is most effective for growing strawberry bushes. He purchases two different brands of planting soil from a local store. Jackson applies brand A to an area of the yard that receives full sunlight and brand B to another area of the yard that is in partial sunlight. He waters the area with brand B daily; he waters the area with brand A every other day. At the end of the study, Jackson concludes brand A is more effective in growing strawberry bushes. Is Jackson's conclusion valid? Explain why or why not.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Enrique Horton · Answer 1

The answer to this question can be described as follows:

Step-by-step explanation:

In the outcome of Jackson isn't legitimate as product A and product B were n't considered equal in watering the plants. It is the preparation for all two to be compared, Product A with only a region of the backyard, which receives direct energy, and Product B will be maintained regularly by the very same area of the yards, that is in minimal lighting.