Ask Question
25 April, 00:09

Identify the fallacies of weak induction committed by the following arguments, giving a brief explanation for your answer. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." There is substantial evidence that units of the Chinese military hack into the computers of American technology companies to steal intellectual property and trade secrets. But Chinese Premier Li Keqiang denies that this happens. Therefore, given Mr. Li's intimate knowledge of the Chinese military, we must conclude that the Chinese military does not engage in hacking.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 25 April, 00:31
    0
    The correct answer is: Appeal to false authority. He is obvisouly biased
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Identify the fallacies of weak induction committed by the following arguments, giving a brief explanation for your answer. If no fallacy is ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers