Ask Question
27 September, 12:48

The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. The correlation coefficient relating the two variables is - 0.26.

Which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables?

A. It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.

B. It is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

C. It is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.

D. It is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 27 September, 12:58
    0
    The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A. It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal." the statement that describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variable is that A. It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers