Ask Question
20 February, 04:37

For the years between 1990 and 2009, the regression equation yˆ=0.15x+3.95 models the minimum wage, where x is the number of years after 1990.

Which statement is the best interpretation of the slope? Which statement is the best interpretation of the y-intercept? Select both correct responses.

Question 3 options:

The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $4.10.

The minimum wage increased by $0.15 every 4 years.

The minimum wage in 2000 was $3.95.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

The minimum wage increased by $3.95 per year.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 20 February, 04:55
    0
    1.) The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

    5.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

    7.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.

    Step-by-step explanation:

    given that the years between 1990 and 2009, the regression equation yˆ=0.15x+3.95 models the minimum wage.

    where x = 19 years

    The slope = 0.15

    The intercept = 3.95

    The best statement for interpretation of the slope and interpretation of the y-intercept are:

    1.) The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

    5.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

    7.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “For the years between 1990 and 2009, the regression equation yˆ=0.15x+3.95 models the minimum wage, where x is the number of years after ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers