Ask Question
8 February, 20:42

A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27. Which of these mats has the lower cost per square foot, and how much lower is it?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 8 February, 21:00
    0
    Step-by-step explanation:

    A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. Since both sides of the mat are equal, it means that the mat is a square. Area of a square is expressed as Length^2.

    The length of the 3 -ft by 3 -ft is

    3^2 = 9ft^2

    If 9ft^2 cost 43

    Then 1ft^2 costs $

    x = 43/9 = $4.78 per square foot

    A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27

    Since both sides of the foam mat are unequal, it means that the foam mat is a rectangle. Area of a rectangle is expressed as Length * width

    The length is 4 -ft and the width is

    3 -ft

    Area of the foam mat = 4*3 = 12 ft^2

    If 12ft^2 cost 27

    Then 1ft^2 costs $y

    y = 27/12 = $2.25 per square foot

    The foam mat is cheaper because it has a lower cost per square foot

    Difference in cost is $4.78 - 2.25

    = $2.53
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A certain 3 -ft by 3 -ft rubber shop-floor mat costs $43. A 3 -ft by 4 -ft foam mat costs $27. Which of these mats has the lower cost per ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers