If your claim is in the null hypothesis and you reject the null hypothesis, then your conclusion would be:

a. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the original claim.

b. The sample data support the original claim.

c. There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the original claim.

d. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the original claim.

Question

Paola Hester

Mathematics

7 September, 23:22

If your claim is in the null hypothesis and you reject the null hypothesis, then your conclusion would be:

a. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the original claim.

b. The sample data support the original claim.

c. There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the original claim.

d. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the original claim.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Gideon Salazar · Answer 1

(C) There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the original claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

If my claim is in the null hypothesis and I reject the null hypothesis, it means the claim is not supported.

The claim would have been supported if I failed to reject the null hypothesis.

The conclusion would therefore be that there is not sufficient sample evidence to support the original claim.