Ask Question
15 March, 13:28

To reduce laboratory costs, water samples from four public swimming pools are combined for one test for the presence of bacteria. further testing is done only if the combined sample tests positive. based on past results, there is a 0.002 probability of finding bacteria in a public swimming area. find the probability that a combined sample from four public swimming areas will reveal the presence of bacteria. is the probability low enough so that further testing of the individual samples is rarely necessary?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 15 March, 13:48
    0
    An interesting and practical problem.

    Assume that

    1. prevalence (p=0.002) is uniform in all pools.

    2. no more bacteria is introduced during the process of transporting and combining the samples.

    Probability that all four pools test negative

    = (1-p) ^4

    =0.998^4

    =0.992024

    =>

    Probability that at least one pool tests positive

    = 1-0.992024

    = 0.007976

    which is approximately four times that of an individual pool.

    Assuming the cost of testing 1 sample is the same as cost of testing the combined sample, which is denoted by C.

    The long term cost of testing pooled samples of four pools

    =0.992024C+0.007976 * (5C) [5C because all four pools must be tested individually]

    =1.031C as opposed to 4C, a savings of 74%.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “To reduce laboratory costs, water samples from four public swimming pools are combined for one test for the presence of bacteria. further ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers