Ask Question
4 May, 06:41

When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - 4, and x = 6. Angie says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Jamal is correct, and describe a situation where Angie is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist that they are both correct? Justify your reasoning.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 4 May, 06:43
    0
    Rational function is a function that contains a fraction.

    Jamal is correct if the numerator of the fraction contains the variable x and its denominator is an integer that is not 0.

    Angie is correct if the denominator of the fraction contains the variable x and substituting the value of x will result to a denominator of 0.

    A rational function can't be a function if its denominator is 0.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers