Ask Question
31 May, 15:35

Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners. Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). p

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 31 May, 15:45
    0
    No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

    Step-by-step explanation:

    Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet (s).

    No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners.

    Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

    No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

    According to nypost, they spend an average of $2000 + a year on their pets. So 3 owners either spending $720 on their pets each or combined is unrealistic. If this is wrong, it's because I have no idea what the function is.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers