Ask Question
27 July, 07:11

When conducting scientific research, any information that is found must be analyzed to determine its validity. John believes that UFOs and extraterrestrial life exist. The excerpts below are an eyewitness account of UFO activity in South Carolina. Which of these observations is valid?

a.

"I can tell from a firsthand experience that yes, UFOs do exist."

b.

"One thing for sure is that they were UFOs and they had to be piloted by some type of intelligent life."

c.

Both of these observations are valid.

d.

Neither of these observations is valid.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 27 July, 07:29
    0
    Neither of these observations are valid - they're both unfalsifiable.

    the first one, where the witness claims UFOs exsist, then until more people see the UFOs, this cannot be analyzed by our current technologies.

    the second, seems a bit more probable and believable by thte way it'd been put, because it's not possible that a piece of moss from a tree could drive any sort of mode of transportation, thus making it literally sure that an inteligent lifeform was driving the ship
  2. 27 July, 07:31
    0
    D is the answer to this
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When conducting scientific research, any information that is found must be analyzed to determine its validity. John believes that UFOs and ...” in 📗 Physics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers