Ask Question
19 March, 22:51

How does the long-run equilibrium for a monopolistically competitive market differ from the long-run equilibrium for a perfectly competitive market?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 19 March, 23:14
    0
    Answer and Explanation:

    The main difference between monopolistic competition and perfect competitive market are given bellow

    Excess capacity : There is constantly an overabundance limit in monopolistic challenge and not in the ideal challenge. Over the long haul, superbly aggressive firms produce at the proficient scale, where as monopolistically focused firms produce beneath this level. Firms are said to have abundance limit under monopolistic challenge. As it were, a monopolistically focused firm, in contrast to a splendidly aggressive firm, could build the amount it delivers and lower the normal all out expense of generation.

    Markup over marginal cost: the another distinction between flawless challenge and monopolistic challenge is the connection among cost and minor expense. At an aggressive firm consistently cost equivalents negligible expense. Where as, in monopolistically aggressive firm, cost surpasses minimal expense becouse the firm consistently have some market control.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How does the long-run equilibrium for a monopolistically competitive market differ from the long-run equilibrium for a perfectly ...” in 📗 Physics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers