Ask Question
19 September, 12:51

The data showed that there was no significant difference in healing times between the two groups, so the researcher concluded that calcium intake has no effect on bone healing time. Why is the conclusion of the researcher not justified?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 19 September, 12:56
    0
    Without knowing the structure and methods of his study,

    and the methods of selecting the population sample, we

    can't tell whether his conclusion is justified or not.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The data showed that there was no significant difference in healing times between the two groups, so the researcher concluded that calcium ...” in 📗 Physics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers