Although state societies are efficient in organizing people and resources, they also are associated with many disadvantages, such as extreme disparities in wealth, use of force to keep people in line, and harsh laws. Given these difficulties, why do you think the state has survived? Do you think human populations can develop alternative political organizations in the future?

Question

Carly Parsons

Social Studies

9 November, 08:04

Although state societies are efficient in organizing people and resources, they also are associated with many disadvantages, such as extreme disparities in wealth, use of force to keep people in line, and harsh laws. Given these difficulties, why do you think the state has survived? Do you think human populations can develop alternative political organizations in the future?

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Brynlee David · Answer 1

The following are the reason the state has survived;:

Because of the government assistance of the huge area of society Because of the conviction and backing of the bigger area of individuals In particular, because of the tremendous military and hierarchical base of the states make it solid and some more.

Indeed, the human populace can build up their option political associations according to their prerequisites and it has been happening since long to receive new options for the advancement and what's to come is hanging tight for that change.