Ask Question
3 March, 09:18

It is best for artists to build a practical and safe career that will guarantee them a secure income, and then pursue their art in their spare time. That way, they will be motivated to work hard at their day jobs to support their art making, and both their career and their art will thrive. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument? a. Some forms of art making are expensive and require a good deal of money to pursue. b. Many people who aren't artists prefer to pursue practical and safe careers. c. Having the time and money to make art doesn't guarantee an artist commercial success. d. Splitting time between two pursuits in life often causes both to suffer.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 3 March, 09:28
    0
    The answer is D - Splitting time between two pursuits in life often causes both to suffer.

    Explanation:

    Often times people work two or more jobs to meet ends. However, there could also be a disadvantage as splitting between two pursuits in life can cause both to suffer. This can be because there is not enough time dedicated for each job. Performance in both pursuits could also suffer if the individual ends up working too many hours each week and they will end up too tired or strained to give their best.

    For the artist this can affect both his or her job in which they are getting paid and their inspiration or time needed for art.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “It is best for artists to build a practical and safe career that will guarantee them a secure income, and then pursue their art in their ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers