Ask Question
14 February, 05:35

Marty's paper argues that nutrition education should be increased in schools because childhood obesity is increasing in the united states. during peer evaluation, his friend offers a counterclaim that nutrition education has no effect on obesity. is this counterclaim appropriate? why or why not?

a. yes, it is both defensible and arguable.

b. no, because it is not arguable.

c. no, because it is not defensible.

d. no, because it is neither defensible nor arguable.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 14 February, 05:38
    0
    A. Yes, it is both defensible and arguable.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Marty's paper argues that nutrition education should be increased in schools because childhood obesity is increasing in the united states. ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers