Ask Question
3 March, 05:18

A hockey player who was playing in the final game of the season before a hostile crowd in the opponent's packed stadium had an opportunity to get his team into the playoffs, but he missed a shot into an open net as the horn sounded, ending the game. As the crowd cheered and jeered, the puck bounced back to him and he shot it in anger toward the stands. A fan who had been looking the other way turned back toward the rink just in time to be struck in the face by the puck. He suffered a broken nose and a severe gash under his eye. After the game, the league commissioner fined the player for violating league rules by intentionally directing the puck out of the playing area. If the fan sues the player for battery, will the fan likely prevail?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 3 March, 05:33
    0
    Yes the fan would prevail it, because the player knew that it was certain that a fan would be hit by the puck. So in this is very clear how the the fan would know that, because both of them already knew it.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A hockey player who was playing in the final game of the season before a hostile crowd in the opponent's packed stadium had an opportunity ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers