Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or

unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?

Question

Erik White

Social Studies

8 July, 17:34

Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or

unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Rachael Mayer · Answer 1

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Dominique Armstrong · Answer 2

Dominique Armstrong 8 July, 17:58

0

Answer:unconstitutional

Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional orunconstitutional? What is their reasoning?

Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or

unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?