Ask Question
29 August, 21:50

If you are offended and experience revulsion at my eating veal, and i am horrified and repulsed by your eating tofu, or by touching it, is that adequate evidence or an argument that either eating veal or tofu is immoral?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 29 August, 22:09
    0
    This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:

    Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)

    We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “If you are offended and experience revulsion at my eating veal, and i am horrified and repulsed by your eating tofu, or by touching it, is ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers