What theory of liability could Mr. Melnick use to try to claim damages for his dog?

1. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for the criminal acts of their employees acting within the scope of employment.

2. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for torts of their agents at all times.

3. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for the torts of agents acting within the scope of employment.

4. Strict liability makes principals liable for all acts of their agents.

Question

Tasha

Social Studies

17 November, 03:01

What theory of liability could Mr. Melnick use to try to claim damages for his dog?

1. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for the criminal acts of their employees acting within the scope of employment.

2. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for torts of their agents at all times.

3. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for the torts of agents acting within the scope of employment.

4. Strict liability makes principals liable for all acts of their agents.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jabari Cobb · Answer 1

1. Respondeat superior makes principals liable for the criminal acts of their employees acting within the scope of employment.

Explanation:

Theory of liability states that one is liable for the guilt if he is associated to that person who commits the crime.

Respondeat superior is a belief that a party is held responsible for the acts of their agents. Thus Mr. Melnick is claiming damage for his dog against the principal who is considered liable for the criminal acts of the employees within the range of employment.