Seaside Cannery, Inc., is one of many producers of canned seafood. Seaside refuses to sell its products to Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation. This refusal is most likely

not a violation of antitrust law.

Question

Annabella Paul

Social Studies

21 April, 05:39

Seaside Cannery, Inc., is one of many producers of canned seafood. Seaside refuses to sell its products to Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation. This refusal is most likely

not a violation of antitrust law.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Hillary Dickson · Answer 1

not a violation of antitrust law

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this refusal is most likely not a violation of antitrust law. That is because these laws are designed to promote competition. Therefore since they are one of many producers, refusal to sell is not a violation. The Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation can obtain another provider.

Seaside Cannery, Inc., is one of many producers of canned seafood. Seaside refuses to sell its products to Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation. This refusal is most likelynot a violation of antitrust law.

Seaside Cannery, Inc., is one of many producers of canned seafood. Seaside refuses to sell its products to Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation. This refusal is most likely

not a violation of antitrust law.