Which of the following is not a reason that small societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies

a. Smaller societies have a smaller demand for resources

b. Smaller societies can be governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies

c. Smaller societies can be governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies

d. None of the above

Question

Kai Ingram

Social Studies

15 February, 22:38

Which of the following is not a reason that small societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies

a. Smaller societies have a smaller demand for resources

b. Smaller societies can be governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies

c. Smaller societies can be governed by internal controls more effectively than larger societies

d. None of the above

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Finley Vance · Answer 1

I believe the answer is: D. none of the above

Option A is wrong because larger amount of resources meant that the society have more option to support the citizen's living, which tend to lead to more stability.

option b and c is wrong because larger societies tend to be able to employ more people with different abilities, which make it better for internal controls.

Demarcus Schaefer · Answer 2

"None of the above" are not reasons why small societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies, since all of them have a certain merit.