Ask Question
31 October, 06:00

Suppose that 62 %62% of families living in a certain country own aa minivanminivan and 16 %16% own aa trucktruck. The addition rule might suggest, then, that 78 %78% of families own either aa minivanminivan or aa trucktruck. What's wrong with that reasoning?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 31 October, 06:08
    0
    Events are not disjoint

    Explanation:

    Let A represents an event that 62% of families living in a certain country own a minivan and B represents an event that 16% own a truck.

    As events A and B are not disjoint, so the addition rule does not imply that 78 %of families own either a minivan or a truck.

    There may be some families who owe both minivans and trucks.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Suppose that 62 %62% of families living in a certain country own aa minivanminivan and 16 %16% own aa trucktruck. The addition rule might ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers