Ask Question
20 January, 15:31

Based on previous Supreme Court rulings, which would be considered a display of the Ten Commandments that does not violate the Constitution?

A. a display in a public school classroom

B. a large cultural and historical display

C. a display that is meant to support a religion

D. a town display celebrating the Bible

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 20 January, 15:58
    0
    The Supreme Court has ruled in the past on where the Ten Commandments can be displayed that will not violate the Constitution. One place where they can be displayed without violating the Constitution is a large cultural and historical display. The correct answer is B.
  2. 20 January, 15:59
    0
    Correct answer choice is:

    B. a large cultural and historical display

    Explanation:

    A national campaign has been mounted to post the ten commandments publically in colleges, courthouses, and different public buildings. On Gregorian calendar month, twenty-one, 1999, the family analysis council associated over 36 members of Congress launched an initiative, referred to as the "Hang Ten" project, to show the Decalogue in legislature offices, public colleges, and different public buildings. The Supreme Court has ruled in the past on where the Ten Commandments can be displayed that will not violate the Constitution. One place where they can be displayed without violating the Constitution is a large cultural and historical display.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Based on previous Supreme Court rulings, which would be considered a display of the Ten Commandments that does not violate the ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers