A concurring opinion explains (A) explains the chief justice's position on a case. (B) is delivered when a justice decides the same way on a case as the majority, but has a different reason for reaching that decision. (C) is delivered when the Court interprets a constitutional issue. (D) is delivered when at least two justices, but less than a majority, hold the same opinion in a case. (E) explains why the Court accepted the case in the first place.

Question

Esparza

Social Studies

17 June, 21:43

A concurring opinion explains (A) explains the chief justice's position on a case. (B) is delivered when a justice decides the same way on a case as the majority, but has a different reason for reaching that decision. (C) is delivered when the Court interprets a constitutional issue. (D) is delivered when at least two justices, but less than a majority, hold the same opinion in a case. (E) explains why the Court accepted the case in the first place.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Tanner Nixon · Answer 1

Answer: the correct answer is B) is delivered when a justice decides the same way on a case as the majority, but has a different reason for reaching that decision.

Explanation:

A concurring opinion occurs when two parties have similar verdict about a legal issue but other hypothesis to reach that verdict.