Ask Question
6 June, 01:41

Fred is a resident of California. He entered a contract with Kimberly for the purchase of a rare book for $35,000. Kimberly is a resident of Arizona. Kim delivers the book, but Fred does not pay. Kimberly wants to file suit in the Federal District Court of Arizona. Which of the following is true? a. The Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship. b. The Court had concurrent jurisdiction with the State Court of Arizona. c. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship. d. None of the above.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 6 June, 02:01
    0
    Option. C

    Explanation:

    The court has a subject matter jurisdiction, because it is a federal institution and what Fred did is against any law and he will be charged accordingly and since it is a federal district court the case was presented too, they have jurisdiction of the subject matter because it is also the same federal law that binds the same states.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Fred is a resident of California. He entered a contract with Kimberly for the purchase of a rare book for $35,000. Kimberly is a resident ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers