Ask Question
2 January, 11:11

If people were better off as hunter gatherers why then did most of the worlds population choose agriculture

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 2 January, 11:17
    0
    The thing is, people were not really better off as hunter gatherers. Hunter gatherers were never sure if there would be enough food: in the winder, or when they had bad luck, they would not eat and the weak could starve. That's why they were so happy to change to agriculture.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “If people were better off as hunter gatherers why then did most of the worlds population choose agriculture ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers