Ask Question
25 December, 08:08

Andrew agrees to paint Betty's house for $2,000. Two days after he starts the job, he decides that $2,000 is not enough money. He refuses to finish the job unless Betty agrees to pay him $1,000 more. What law applies to this fact situation

a. The acceptance of additional money to settle a disputed claim is supported by consideration.

b. A past obligation is sufficient consideration for a new promise.

c. Andrew gives no additional consideration in return for modification of a preexisting contract.

d. Betty has made a promise in exchange for a forbearance.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 25 December, 08:18
    0
    i think its a

    Explanation:

    The Concept of Legal Sufficiency

    As suggested in Section 11.1 "General Perspectives on Consideration", what is required in contract is the exchange of a legal detriment and a legal benefit; if that happens, the consideration is said to have legal sufficiency Something of value enough to constitute consideration ...
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Andrew agrees to paint Betty's house for $2,000. Two days after he starts the job, he decides that $2,000 is not enough money. He refuses ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers