In testimony to the court, Harold Geyser, President of the American Accounting Society, said that the CFO of the Abracadabra Corporation falsified the corporation's financial statements. Therefore, members of the jury, you must conclude that the CFO did indeed falsify these statements.

a. Amphiboly.

b. No fallacy.

c. Appeal to unqualified authority.

d. False cause.

e. Begging the question.

Question

Guest

Social Studies

10 September, 09:32

In testimony to the court, Harold Geyser, President of the American Accounting Society, said that the CFO of the Abracadabra Corporation falsified the corporation's financial statements. Therefore, members of the jury, you must conclude that the CFO did indeed falsify these statements.

a. Amphiboly.

b. No fallacy.

c. Appeal to unqualified authority.

d. False cause.

e. Begging the question.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jovanni Blevins · Answer 1

No fallacy

Explanation:

No fallacy is a term that explained the wrong or invalid use of reasoning. It is used in the construction of the argument. Many of the arguments are deceptive because of not of real appearance.

Many of the fallacies are intentionally manipulated to persuade the deception. Some of the fallacies are applied unintentionally because of carelessness or ignorance.

The formal fallacy is expressed by neatly in the stander ed logical system. There are different types of fallacies such as mathematical fallacy.