Ask Question
22 January, 16:45

Original Source Material:

While most saw a value in using games, as: 'good for visual/kinesthetic learners'; 'makes teaching and learning more fun, learners are able to work at their own pace'; 'breaks up the lesson, different learner styles'; 'give my students variety and some fun whilst reinforcing their learning'.

Student Version:

According to Freitas (2006), games can support the learning styles of visual and kineasthetics learners. Games can make teaching and learning more fun, and learners are able to work at their own pace. Also, games are seen as a break from a lesson in which students reinforce their learning during the break.

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

a. Word-for-Word plagiarism

b. Paraphrasing plagiarism

c. This is not plagiarism

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 22 January, 16:57
    0
    It can be said that the student version exemplifies paraphrasing plagiarism.

    Explanation:

    The contexts of the texts given above under the titles original source material and student version are clearly the same. It can be observed that most words used in both texts are the same but the arrangement of the words is different. To retain the meaning of the text but still make the text look different, the formation of the sentences has been made differently using the same words. Hence, it can be called an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Original Source Material: While most saw a value in using games, as: 'good for visual/kinesthetic learners'; 'makes teaching and learning ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers