Ask Question
5 February, 02:56

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

effective secondary source document

too biased for historical evidence

too focused for historical evidence

unreliable narrative source

useful primary source document

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 5 February, 02:59
    0
    It would be an "a. effective secondary source document" that best describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event, since the information as had time to "settle"--although of course this doesn't automatically mean that the chart is "effective".
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event? effective secondary source document too biased for ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers