Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist's results and conclusion?
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
The? of the story should be interesting. interesting title conversation respond whole
Answers (1)
Summarize each of the following excerpts from the Emancipation Proclamation. "And by virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of states, are,
Answers (1)
What does the electoral college do?
Answers (2)
Another word for a religions group
Answers (1)
What are the cultural characteristics of Mexico?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Social Studies
What percentage of Georgia's imports are handled by the port of Savannah today?
Answers (2)
If reinforcement occurs after every sixth response, which schedule of reinforcement is this?
Answers (1)
Que funcion cumple el sol en los ciclos biogeoquimicos?
Answers (1)
Which of the following statements is not true about genes
Answers (1)
Because of (blank) some countries using Euro faced bankruptcy and threatened the value of the euro
Answers (1)