Ask Question
1 December, 07:53

Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist's results and conclusion?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 1 December, 08:15
    0
    it contains only sixteen letters and would be easy to design into a rectangular shape.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers