Ask Question
15 July, 08:14

A juice company falsely claims that its drinks reduce the incidence of heart attacks. Which practice, regulated by consumer protection laws, is this? price fixing predatory pricing bid rigging making misleading statements

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 15 July, 08:44
    0
    D). Making misleading statements.

    Explanation:

    The practice regulated by the juice company would be categorized as 'making misleading statements' under Consumer Protection Laws as it 'falsely puts forward the claim that the drink sold by it reduces the incidents or cases of heart attacks'. Such statements are deceptive or misleading as it misdirects the readers to follow or adopt a forged product which could lead to disastrous or unwanted consequences. Thus, such practices are prohibited under 'Consumer Protection Laws' as these practices go against the interests of the consumers. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A juice company falsely claims that its drinks reduce the incidence of heart attacks. Which practice, regulated by consumer protection ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers