Ask Question

In Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale, Pagan sued, questioning a village ordinance prohibiting the parking of a car on a public street for the purpose of displaying it for sale. Pagan won because

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 27 March, 14:14
    0
    Glendale was not able to prove that the ordinance directly advanced the claim of interest in public safety.

    Explanation:

    Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale is a case in which Christopher Pagan wanted to sell his car and put a for sale sign on it and parked it on a city street. Because of this, he received a notice that his car was in violation of a city ordinance that didn't allow him to do this. He filed a suit claiming that the law was unconstitutional because it violated his First Amendment right. Pagan won because Glendale couldn't provide enough evidence that the ordinance had the goal of avoiding a potential harm. It was considered that the law didn't serve a government interest in public safety.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale, Pagan sued, questioning a village ordinance prohibiting the parking of a car on a public ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers